Legal Opinion
Mickle v. Lipstock
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided October 22, 1965No. Civ. A. No. AC-1127PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Motion of plaintiff for Summary Judgment “based upon the record in this case, including interrogatories, depositions and the statement of uncontested fact's as set forth in letter dated August 28, 1965 from defendant’s counsel,” originally filed September 8, 1965, combined with “cross-motion on behalf of the defendant * * * ” filed October 14, 1965, seek decision by this Court pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel admitted, at the hearing of October 14, 1965, that the issue of the quantum of damages was of such contest as to forbid finding by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Peckham v. Ronrico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Armco Steel Corporation, a Corporation v. Realty Investment Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Seward v. NissenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1942
- Cassady v. Duke Power Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1269, 4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 741, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7775 Brisco Huff, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. N. D. Cass Company of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Huff v. N. D. Cass Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Amick v. Gooding Amusement Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
- Farrell v. HollingsworthDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
- Hawkins v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1968