Legal Opinion
Dinallo v. DAL Electric
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 18, 2007PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*982In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant DAL Electric appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated July 29, 2006, as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging common-law negligence and violations of Labor Law § 200 insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant ThyssenKrupp Elevator separately appeals from so much of the same order as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sun Ho Chung v. Jeong Sook JohAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Greenstein v. Realife Land Improvement, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dinallo v. DAL ElectricAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Soussi v. GobinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ulrich v. Motor Parkway PropertiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Landahl v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sanchez v. BBL Constr. Servs., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.