People v. Wall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of two counts of murder in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review since he did *813not raise in the Supreme Court the specific ground that he now raises on appeal (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]; People v Burgess, 75 AD3d 650 [2010]). In any event, the contention is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. DaddonaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. BonillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. Cruz-ChecoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.