Dorian Ragland v. United States

RILEY, Chief Judge.

Dorian Ragland appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, asserting his trial counsel “provided ineffective assistance by failing to challenge the timeliness of his indictment pursuant to the limitations imposed by 18 U.S.C. § 3282.” Ragland also requests we expand the certificate of appealability and remand for further consideration in light of Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 881, 187 L.Ed.2d 715 (2014), which was decided after the district court denied § 2255 relief. Upon de novo re…