Miriam Flores v. John Huppenthal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge,
concurring in Parts I.1-I.4 of the majority opinion, and concurring in the judgment:
I agree with the majority that the district court obeyed the Supreme Court’s directives regarding how the remand in this case should proceed, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in, accordingly, granting Rule 60(b)(5) relief to Defendants. I nevertheless write separately becaqse I understand Plaintiffs to be making additional arguments not addressed by the majority, and I believe their arguments merit a response. Specifically, I understand Plaintiffs to be arguing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Castaneda v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Burdick v. TakushiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009