Legal Opinion

Warner v. Hoffman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1936No. 1257PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT

We are tendered an entry by counsel for appellee wherein certificate is made that the 'judgment in the instant cause is in conflict with the judgment in Soliday, Guardian v Ach et, 40 Oh Ap, 498 (10 Abs 364), and Huntington National Bank of Columbus, Trustee v Fulton, Supt. et, 49 Oh Ap, 268 (17 Abs 711, 19 Abs 610).

We find no such similarity in questions involved or legal principles considered and determined in the Huntington National Bank case to indicate any conflict whatever.

The syllabus in Soliday, Guardian v Ash et al, seems to conflict with our determination in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Soliday, Gdn. v. AshOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Huntington Natl Bank v. FultonOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Huntington Natl. Bank v. Fulton, Supt.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marks, Gdn. v. MarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API