Legal Opinion

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Williams v. Thibodeaux

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 28, 1989No. 88-03202PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONOVER, Judge.

The appellants, State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS), and Nerissa Leighton Williams challenge a final judgment entered in a paternity action. We find that the trial court erred by entering a judgment in favor of the appellee, Charles Richard Thibodeaux, at the conclusion of the appellants’ case-in-chief and, accordingly, reverse.

HRS, on the behalf of Nerissa Leighton Williams, filed a paternity and support action against the appellee. The appellee filed an answer denying the material allegations of the appellants’ complaint. During a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tillman v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. Sea Tower Apart., Inc. v. Century Nat. Bk.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Buchanan Constr., Inc. v. City of TallahasseeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Service Facilities Corp. v. LanierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Miami Purveyors, Inc. v. ForteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ruck Bros. Brick v. Kellogg & KimseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. May v. PHH Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Saporito v. MadrasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Capital Media, Inc. v. HaaseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. BloedelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API