Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Angelo McMullan v. Raymond Booker

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 5, 2014No. 12-1305Published

1Concurring in the judgmentClay, Circuit Judge

I concur with the judgment of the lead opinion, but write separately because the lead opinion contains a substantial amount of dicta that I do not endorse.

This Court is unable to grant McMullan habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) because the Supreme Court has never held that the Due Process Clause requires a lesser-included offense instruction in a non-capital case. See Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625, 638 n. 14, 100 S.Ct. 2382, 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980) (declining to decide whether the Due Process Clause would require giving lesser-included offense instructions in a non-capital case). The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Johnny Ray Bagby v. Dewey Sowders, Warden, Northpoint Training CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Jerome Campbell v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. People v. BullsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API