Legal Opinion

Aistrop v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1893No. 85PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Burke. This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for murder in the second degree, the punishment being fifteen years in the penitentiary. There is no statement of facts in the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of fifteen years.

1. The conviction occurred on November 12, 1892, motion for new trial overruled on the 21st of the same month, and notice of appeal thereupon entered. The court adjourned for the term on December 10 thereafter. Under a rule of the court, Monday of each week was set apart for hearing and disposing of the motion docket. It was a rule of practice in the trial court, and so understood by defendant and counsel, that statements of fact in…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Rasberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Hutchins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Cannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API