Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2013No. 11-90135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Order filed on August 24, 2012, and reported at 690 F.3d 1137, is amended. The amended order filed concurrently with this order is substituted in its place.

AMENDED ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Complainant alleges that a district judge mishandled the termination of two former employees and interfered with one of the employee’s efforts to get a new job. Complainant is not one of the employees and claims no direct knowledge of these allegations.

“Personnel decisions are administrative functions, not judicial functions.” In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct, 366 F.3d 963, 965 (9th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. In re Complaint of Judicial MisconductJudicial Council of The Ninth Circuit · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. In re Complaint of Judicial MisconductJudicial Council of The Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API