Legal Opinion

Fordson Coal Co. v. Maggard

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1924No. 4107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The District Court refused a preliminary injunction to prevent the collection of a tax, but continued the restraining order pending this appeal.

While it is the rule that the granting or refusing of a preliminary injunction is discretionary, yet it is equally well settled that if the plaintiff makes a ease showing a reasonable probability of prevailing on the final hearing, and if his damage will be irreparable if the injunction is refused, while defendant can, by proper bond, be secured against any damage coming from the temporary injunction, a sound discretion usually…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Louisville Home Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  2. Louisville Trust Co. v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  3. Sanford v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Couty v. BosworthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Craig v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Tumulty v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Coolbeth v. BerberianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  4. Western Electric Co. v. Cinema Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. Fordson Coal Co. v. MaggardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API