Legal Opinion
People v. Detroit United Railway
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1910No. Docket Nos. 110 and 111Published
Certiorari to the recorder’s court of Detroit; Phelan, J. The Detroit United Railway was convicted of violating a city ordinance, and sentenced to pay a fine of $100.
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
Stone, J.
A rehearing having been granted in these cases, they have been reargued and reconsidered. The sole question here involved, as we view it, is the construction to be placed upon an ordinance granted the Detroit City Railway in 3889. Subdivision D of section 3 of such ordinance reads as follows:
“Such arrangements shall be made by said company that within two months after this ordinance shall have been accepted by said company it shall carry such passen*464gers as shall have taken passage on the cars between the hours of five-thirty o’clock and seven o’clock in the morning, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Louis Gaslight Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Indiana Railway Co. v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Town of Toledo v. EdensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Township of West Bloomfield v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1906