Legal Opinion

In re Smith

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 23, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, District Judge.

Several creditors objected to the discharge of the above bankrupt.

Three specifications were urged. Only the first, which the referee sustained, requires discussion here. It reads as follows: “1. For the reason that with intent to conceal his true financial condition Be has failed to keep books of account or records, and has destroyed and concealed books or records, from which such financial condition might be ascertained.” The words are substantially those of the statute.

Before the referee the bankrupt assailed the specification as insufficient as a matter of law in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Karger v. SandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. Nix v. SternbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. In Re RussellDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1931
  4. E. H. Godshalk Co. v. SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
  5. In re Milgraum & OstDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. L&R Development & Investment Corp; Jose Lopez Aviles; Nilsa Enid Guzman Bidot v. Hector Noel Roman; Myrna Enid Perez Vega; Able Insurance Agency, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API