Legal Opinion

Johnson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1988No. Civ. 880009PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises from a dispute between the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau and claimant Margaret Johnson regarding the amount of reimbursement she is entitled to receive for expenses connected with traveling to and from medical treatment. Johnson appeals from a district court judgment. The Bureau reimburses claimants for travel expenses pursuant to its own “Directive No. 15-C Amended.” We conclude the Bureau’s directive is ineffective as it relates to Johnson because *515the Bureau failed to comply with the rule-making procedure set forth in the North Dakota…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank of Leeds v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hite v. Evart Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Pavel v. Hughes Brothers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Ney v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. St. Onge v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Illies v. IlliesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Smith v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Little v. TraynorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API