Legal Opinion
Raynor Brothers, a General Partnership v. American Cyanimid Company, Agricultural Division, a Foreign Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1982No. 81-5928PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
American Cyanimid appeals from an adverse jury verdict in a products liability case arguing that the district court erred in: (1) granting the motion substituting plaintiffs in the complaint and for relation back; (2) denying American Cyanimid’s post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial based on the jury’s damage verdict; (3) denying American Cyanimid’s post-trial motions based on the alleged statute of limitations defense. We affirm.
FACTS
Raynor Brothers is an Arizona farming partnership of three brothers. The brothers, along with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- John Staren and David Henner v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- William H. Traver v. David MeshriyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Jacobson v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Metropolitan Paving Co. v. International Union of Operating EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Bowles v. ReadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Cape Ann Investors v. LeponeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.