Childers v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
Where, after this court affirmed a conviction for seduction (Childers v. State, 37 Ga. App. 93, 139 S. E. 88), the accused filed an extraordinary motion for a new trial, based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, and the motion was overruled, this court will not hold that in so ruling the trial judge abused his discretion, where none of the affidavits in support of the two witnesses upon whose evidence a new trial was sought gave the names of their associates (Civil Code (1910), § 6086; Childers v. State, supra; Ivey v. State, 154 Ga. 63 (6), 113 S. E. 175) , and where one of the two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Patterson v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Wheeler v. SalingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Glisson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953