Legal Opinion

Schonhoff v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Stoddard Circuit Court. — Hon. Jas. L. Fort, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

The first point involved in this case regarding the right of plaintiff to sue, is controlled by the decision given in Clubb v. Railroad,— Mo. App. —, on the like facts.

Another defense is failure of plaintiff to give notice of his claim for damages as required by the bill of lading; which made notice a condition precedent to recovery of damages due to delay, and prescribed it should be given in writing to the general officer or nearest station agent of the company, or agent at destination, before the stock -was removed from the point of shipment, or at the place of destination before it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rice v. Kansas Pacific RailwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. George v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Brownsville Livery & Live Stock Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API