Legal Opinion

Livingston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 30, 2003No. 1D03-3221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Contending that the trial judge should have granted a motion for disqualification, Mary M. Livingston petitions this court for a writ of prohibition. We have jurisdiction. Zuehel v. State, 824 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We conclude that the motion was timely and facially sufficient; we therefore grant the petition.

Livingston was convicted of certain felonies and appealed to this court. Some of the convictions were affirmed, but this court found there was insufficient evidence to support other convictions. The cause was reversed and remanded for further proceedings, including…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Zuchel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick JamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Livingston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. LAURA ROSALES v. RIC L. BRADSHAW, Sheriff of Palm Beach CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API