Legal Opinion

People v. Steels

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 1995No. 1-93-4500PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

The defendant’s only hope in this case was to persuade the trial judge that the 28 pounds of cannabis found in his suitcase were seized in violation of the fourth amendment. Inexplicably, the defendant’s lawyer did not move to suppress the evidence, despite a reasonable probability of success. Convicted by a jury of cannabis trafficking, he was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment.

We find the defendant was denied his sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. For that reason, we reverse his conviction and remand the cause for a new trial.

EVIDENCE AT TRIAL

Chicago police…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. BryantIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. OrtizAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. People v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. People v. AnayaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. People v. BarkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API