Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Lanahan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
It appearing that upon review of the .judgment for the appellee in the above-entitled cause it was reversed with direction that the cause be remanded for a new trial in conformity with the opinion, and it further appearing that the cause was tried subsequent to the promulgation of Rule 50(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c,_ and thát a motion was pending below on behalf of the appellant for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (Baltimore & Carolina Line Inc. v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654, 55 S.Ct. 890, 79 L.Ed. 1636), now, therefore, it is ordered that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. v. LanahanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. PistolesiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967