Searle v. Town of Bucksport
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Dissent
JABAR, J.,
with whom ALEXANDER and SILVER, JJ., join, dissenting.
[¶ 28] I respectfully dissent from the Court’s decision. There were two sets of outdoor “permanent bleachers,” one on the home side of the football field and one on the visitors’ side. They provided the same function, they exposed the public to the same physical risks, and they imposed upon the high school the same obligation to make them safe for spectators. Yet the practical effect of the decision is that the Town of Bucksport and the Bucksport School Department are immune from liability for the bleachers on one side of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Town of Moose RiverSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- State v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Sanford v. Town of ShapleighSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Stretton v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Noel v. Town of OgunquitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.