Mais v. Futuristics Foods, Inc.
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtNanette Dembitz, J.
The claimant’s case from his pro se standpoint was a simple one on conceded facts: he had purchased from defendant for $3,000 a franchise in a food delivery service; he had never been able to use the franchise because defendant failed to supply the delivery service; when defendant agreed to a rescission of the franchise agreement, it only refunded $2,000 to claimant. Therefore, according to claimant, defendant owes him $1,000.1
The defense to the claim alleges an accord and satisfaction and involves a consent judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,126 in Re Men's Sportswear, Inc., F/k/a Claude Clement, Ltd., Debtor. Men's Sportswear, Inc. v. Sasson Jeans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Evans v. City of JohnstownNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc. v. F. W. Honerkamp Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Mais v. Futuristic Foods, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978