Legal Opinion

Gainey v. Anderson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 13, 1910No. 7665PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Before SeasE, J., Darlington, June, 1909. Action by Rebecca Gainey against Sarah M. Anderson et al. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. cite: Can a married, woman bind herself not to claim dower? 16 S. C., 91; 33 SI €., 198; 30S. C., 305; 63- S: C./l; 54 S. C., 524; 52 S. C., 104; 48 S. C., 470 ; 20 S. C., 566’; 63 S- C., 166; 15 S. C.,’ 162; 32 S. C., 116; 30 S. C., 302. ’ Does general warranty contain clear covenant against dower? 9 Rich., 378; 5 S'. €., 406; 2…

Read the full summary

Before SeasE, J., Darlington, June, 1909. Action by Rebecca Gainey against Sarah M. Anderson et al. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. cite: Can a married, woman bind herself not to claim dower? 16 S. C., 91; 33 SI €., 198; 30S. C., 305; 63- S: C./l; 54 S. C., 524; 52 S. C., 104; 48 S. C., 470 ; 20 S. C., 566’; 63 S- C., 166; 15 S. C.,’ 162; 32 S. C., 116; 30 S. C., 302. ’ Does general warranty contain clear covenant against dower? 9 Rich., 378; 5 S'. €., 406; 2 Strob., 81; 2 Speer., '652; 27 S. C., 198; 12 S'. C., 62; McM. Eq., 451; 11 Rich. Eq., 110" 74 S, C., 282; 54 S. C.,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

In 1881, J. W. Gainey and his wife, the plaintiff herein, gave McKinnon & McNair their joint and several bonds, conditioned to pay a -debt which Gainey had contracted. At the same time, Gainey gave them a mortgage of a tract of land, owned by him, to secure the debt, and his wife duly renounced her dower thereon. This bond and mortgage were assigned to Carrigan & Silcox. In 1894, the debt being still unpaid, Gainey and wife, by their joint deed, containing the usual covenant of general warrant}'-, conveyed the land to Carrigan &…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCreary v. CoggeshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  2. City of Florence v. BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  3. Moon v. BruceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  4. Brown v. PechmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  5. Miller v. Farmers' BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alston v. BitelySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Tuten v. Almeda FarmsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Belser v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  4. Owings v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API