Legal Opinion
Petak v. City of Paterson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 13, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
291 N.J. Super. 234 (1996)
677 A.2d 244
HERBERT PETAK AND ANITA PETAK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF PATERSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 21, 1996.
Decided June 13, 1996.
Before Judges BAIME, VILLANUEVA and KIMMELMAN.
Donald J. Maizys, Fair Lawn, argued the cause for appellants (Karas, Kilstein, Hirschklau, Feitlin & Youngman, attorneys; Mr. Maizys, of counsel and on the brief).
Alan L. Stein, Paterson, argued the cause for respondent (Susan E. Champion, attorney; Mr. Stein, of counsel and on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Costa v. JoseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Township of Jefferson v. Block 447A, Lot 10New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- In Re Application of County TreasurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Heritage Standard Bank v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Realty Sales Corp. v. PayneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Town of Phillipsburg v. BlockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Aeon Financial, LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Cherokee Equities v. GaraventaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Petak v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996