Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Long

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 17, 1986No. 67339PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

After the Florida Bar filed a nine-count complaint against him, Long filed a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment. The referee recommends both that the plea be accepted and that Long be found guilty of violating article XI, rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule as well as the following disciplinary rules: 1-102(A)(1) (violation of a disciplinary rule), 1-102(A)(6) (conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law), 2-106(A) (excessive fee), 6-103(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter), 7-101(A)(2) (failure to carry out contract of employment), 9-102(A) (failure to deposit client’s…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Florida Bar v. LongSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API