McGowan v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion
OPINION ON REHEARING
In his motion for rehearing, appellant argues for the first time that no trial objection was necessary to preserve the constitutional question for review. Appellant quotes the following passage: “Questions involving the constitutionality of a statute upon which a defendant’s conviction is based should be addressed by appellate courts, even when such issues are raised for the first time on appeal.” Rabb v. State, 730 S.W.2d 751, 752 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (citing Moore v. State, 672 S.W.2d 242 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no pet.)). Appellant notes the courts of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Cockrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Broxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.