Legal Opinion

McGowan v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 13, 1997No. 14-93-01098-CRPublished

1Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

In his motion for rehearing, appellant argues for the first time that no trial objection was necessary to preserve the constitutional question for review. Appellant quotes the following passage: “Questions involving the constitutionality of a statute upon which a defendant’s conviction is based should be addressed by appellate courts, even when such issues are raised for the first time on appeal.” Rabb v. State, 730 S.W.2d 751, 752 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (citing Moore v. State, 672 S.W.2d 242 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no pet.)). Appellant notes the courts of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Cockrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Broxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API