Legal Opinion
Doonan v. Poole
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 2, 1959No. 1273PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHANNON, Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff below, brings this interlocutory appeal from an order of the court below dismissing his complaint against two of the three defendants in a negligence action. The order dismissing the complaint was based on a special appearance and motion to dismiss for improper venue, and provided in part:
“This ruling is based upon the proposition that these defendants are entitled to be sued either in the County in which they reside or in the County in which the cause of action accrued. See Peterson vs. Kirk [Fla.App.], 103 So.2d 656; Enfinger vs. Baxley [Fla.], 96 So.2d…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. McDanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Enfinger v. BaxleySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- McKinnon v. the First National Bank of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- County of Santa Rosa v. TrobuckSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Peterson v. KirkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- Houston v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. GaneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Greyhound Corporation v. RosartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Brown v. NAGELHOUTSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Cicero v. ParadisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.