Bank Mart v. Langley
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The above entitled cases come before this court with the common underlying issue of whether service by newspaper publication is sufficient. Statutes which allow notice by publication are usually permissive. See, e.g., General Statutes § 52-68. It is generally accepted practice in Connecticut that when a defendant cannot be found, the plaintiff will seek an order for notice by publication without establishing that other forms of service can be made.
For example, in the above Langley cases (foreclosure of a mortgage) an attempt was made to serve the defendant owner by registered mail in North…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Deason v. DeasonNew York Supreme Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cato v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Cato v. CatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Chesterfield II Condominium v. Rust A., No. Cv 99-0175143 S (Mar. 28, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- In Interest of Tina, (Mar. 5, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Madison Hills Ltd. Prtn. v. Madison, No. Cv 89-0279115-S (Sep. 19, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994