Legal Opinion

Romanek-Golub & Co. v. Anvan Hotel Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1988No. 87-1704PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan

Plaintiffs, Romanek-Golub & Company and E. Barry Mansur, brought an action against defendants, Anvan Hotel Corporation, Regency Partners and Anthony A. Antoniou, seeking compensation for services they provided in procuring an investor in the Barclay Chicago hotel. In count I of their amended complaint, plaintiffs sought recovery of $300,000 on the basis of a 10% real estate broker’s commission in a “Letter Agreement” dated October 23, 1978. In count II, plaintiffs sought recovery of the same amount on a theory of quantum meruit. Shortly after plaintiffs rested their case, the trial court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. The People v. TrefonasIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Edens View Realty & Investment, Inc. v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Kingston v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Cole v. BrundageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Craft v. PeeblesHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Midcoast Aviation, Inc. v. General Electric Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. FIRST NAT. BANK OF SPRINFIELD v. Malpractice Research, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Schuler v. Mid-Central CardiologyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API