Legal Opinion

Newell Enterprises, Inc. v. Bowling

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2005No. 2004-SC-0263-MRPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice KELLER.

I. INTRODUCTION

In an original action in the Court of Appeals, Appellants petitioned for a writ (1) to set aside the finding by the Bell Circuit Court that an injunction existed against Appellants and (2) to bar pending contempt proceedings against Appellants. The Court of Appeals denied the petition, finding that Appellants had failed to show that they had no adequate remedy by appeal and that they would suffer great and irreparable harm. Appellants now appeal, claiming that because contempt proceedings are different from other proceedings and because the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Kennedy v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Skaggs v. Assad, by and Through AssadKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Chamblee v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Saleba v. SchrandKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Southern Financial Life Insurance Co. v. CombsKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Ridgeway Nursing & Rehabilitation Facility, LLC v. LaneKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Ass'n v. WingateKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Fletcher v. GrahamKentucky Supreme Court · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API