Legal Opinion

Casper v. Doran

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1929No. 4781PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This hearing has partaken of a reargument of the question of whether a basic permit, once granted to the manufacturer of a nonbeverage “article,” can be revoked otherwise than in the method prescribed by Congress for the revocation of a permit by section 9 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 21). More especially, it is whether sueh permit can. be annulled by the expedient of granting it for a year, so that it will expire by time limitation, thus requiring the permit-tee to apply for a new permit, and thereby submitting his claims to a permit to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Wilson v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  3. Chicago Grain Products Co. v. MellonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eleanor Zirin v. E. A. McGinnes District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Swanson Chemical Corporation v. DoranDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Bay State Distributing Corp. v. DoranDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929
  4. Doran v. CasperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
  5. Eleanor Zirin v. E. A. McGinnes District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API