Legal Opinion
Valley Forge Insurance v. Schofield
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 14, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding, inter alia, to stay arbitration of a claim for supplemental underinsured motorist benefits, the petitioner, Valley Forge Insurance Company, appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated March 2, 2000, which, among other things, denied those branches of its application which were to permanently stay arbitration on the grounds that its insured, Marlene Schofield, failed to provide timely notice of her underlying action against the tortfeasor, and timely notice of her claim for supplemental underinsured…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Katz v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. MancusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- MATTER OF FIREMEN'S FUND INS. CO. OF NEWARK v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ward v. Corbally, Gartland & RappleyeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Allstate Insurance v. KrugerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dembitzer v. CheraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Hill International, Inc. v. Town of OrangetownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- G&L Industries, Inc./iOld Action Labs, Inc. v. Bell Bates Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Matter of Bonaguro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Narducci v. Tishman Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003