Salinas City Bank v. De Witt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff seeks to establish a joint liability against the defendants for the amount of an over-draft at its bank. The making of the over-draft was by the defendant George De Witt, and the plaintiff seeks to hold the defendant William De Witt liable therefor by showing that a partnership relation existed between the two. The complaint, which is unverified, alleges “that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff, on account of moneys had and received by them from the plaintiff *79at their special interest and request, in the sum of $865,” and “that the amount of the said indebtedness is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Vanderhurst, Sanborn, & Co. v. De WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nofsinger v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- King v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Milstein v. SartainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Title Insurance and Trust Co. v. GriderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Altadena Mining & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909