Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Gnagie

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

Respondents, Ronald E. Gnagie, Ronald L. Matlock, Charles Lush, Thomas Welsh, and Benny R. Hardesty, individually and as representatives of the Louisville Firefighters’ Association, sought compensation in a class action suit against the City of Louisville, pursuant to KRS 337.285, for the fifteen-minute “roll call” prior to each shift.

Both movant, City of Louisville, and respondents, Ronald E. Gnagie, et al., moved for summary judgment in Jefferson Circuit Court on the issue of liability.

*237The trial court entered summary judgment for the movant, holding that the “roll…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ebright v. City of WhitehallOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Orms v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metro Louisville/Jefferson County Government v. AbmaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  2. Crime Fighters Patrol v. HilesKentucky Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API