Legal Opinion
Osborne & Thurlow v. Hirsch & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1958PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAron Steuer, J.
This motion pursuant to section 1451 of the Civil Practice Act, to stay the action until arbitration has been had, raises two questions.
Both parties were member firms of the New York Stock Exchange. The constitution of the exchange provides for arbitration of disputes between member firms and there is no claim that an agreement to arbitrate in this form is not binding. However plaintiff asserts that it is not bound because it is no longer a member firm. According to the complaint the acts giving rise to the claim took place in September, 1957. On the last day of that month, plaintiff, a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between Eagar Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Legg, Mason & Company, Inc. v. MacKall & Coe, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1972
- Robert Muh v. Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Does I Through XxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Lewsadder v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Isaacson v. Hayden, Stone IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.