Legal Opinion

Romero v. DeConcini McDonald & Brammer, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 26, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2021PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Appellee was awarded judgment against the appellants in the sum of $12,571.60 for attorneys’ fees. Appellants paid appellee the sum of $11,200 and a satisfaction of judgment was entered by appellee. In this appeal appellants contend that there was insufficient evidence to support the judgment in that there was no showing that they personally promised to pay the attorneys’ fees.

Appellee cross-appeals, contending the trial court erred in denying its motion to set aside the satisfaction of judgment on the grounds that it was entered by mistake.

The testimony of Mr.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morris North American, Inc. v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Borsheim v. O & J PROPERTIESNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. W.F. Conelly Construction Co. v. L. Harvey Concrete, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Knecht, Inc. v. First Indemnity of America InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Borsheim v. O & J PROPERTIESNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API