Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Houston

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1950No. A-11446Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

POWELL, J.

In petition for rehearing, counsel urge:

*59“That said decision is in conflict with an express statute, to which the attention of the Court has not been called in this case, either in brief or oral argument, or which has been, overlooked by the Court.”

While, as stated, petitioner did not raise in his petition for writ of habeas corpus, the question now interposed, and the same was not by this court directly treated, and ordinarily would not at this time be considered, yet, by reason of the nature of the proceedings and the question being one of first impression in this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. MillarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. City of Ardmore v. State Ex Rel. BestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Miami Beach Airline Service, Inc. v. CrandonSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  5. State v. CamelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API