Legal Opinion

59th & Park Associates v. Inselbuch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 9, 1977, denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granting defendant Lamm’s cross motion for summary judgment, severing and dismissing the action and directing entry of judgment in favor of said defendant is modified, on the law, to grant, on the issue of liability only, partial summary judgment against defendants Dryfoos & Co. and Herbert Swarzman in his individual and agency capacity as liquidator, and in favor of defendant Klineman, summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to him, and is otherwise affirmed, without costs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glassman v. HyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Kottler v. New York Bargain House, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. In Re the Estate of RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Barbro Realty Co. v. NewburgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 8182 Maryland Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. SheehanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Dayton Securities Associates v. Securities Group 1980Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. C. E. Hooper, Inc. v. PerlbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Gotlieb v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  5. Lowin v. Dayton Securities Associates (In Re the Securities Group 1980)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API