Legal Opinion

Adams v. Hall

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 28, 1912No. Gen. No. 16,273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles N. Goodnow, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

James Adams, plaintiff in error, brought suit against James T. Hall, defendant in error, in the Municipal Court to recover $500, claimed as commissions earned' by Adams as a real estate broker, for procuring a purchaser of premises owned by Hall, ready, willing and able to purchase said premises upon the terms and conditions named by Hall. The proposed sale was not consummated.

The case was tried below by the court, and at the close of plaintiff’s case upon motion of defendant’s attorney the court found for the defendant and entered judgment against the plaintiff for costs, which action by the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spitzer v. Bradshaw-Praeger & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  2. Nelson v. BoltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Cabry v. IonidasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  4. Pierce v. ReeveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API