Legal Opinion

Exeter Banking Co. v. Sleeper

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 10, 1952No. 4099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The parties agree the issue here is whether a valid mortgage lien existed on the property in question in favor of the defendant Sleeper prior to the creation of the tax liens of the claimant, the United States of America. If such a lien did exist, then Sleeper must prevail. United States v. Sampsell, 153 F. (2d) 731; note 174 A. L. R. 1387. This is true here whether or not the authority of the Sampsell case, so far as it applies to inchoate liens, has been affected by the decision in United States v. Savings Bank, 340 U. S. 47. See also, anno. 95 L. ed. 59, 65, 67. The claimant has no lien…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hargett v. HargettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Exeter Banking Co. v. SleeperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API