Spencer v. Sytsma
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Dissent
. Justice BENDER,
dissenting:
Because no conflict exists between our statutory civil procedure rules of permissive joinder and venue, I respectfully dissent. The plain language of the permissive joinder and venue rules-consistent with their federal law counterparts-grant the trial court broad discretion to use both rules in tandem to choose between different locations to try multiple defendants in one action. Such a flexible interplay between these procedural rules comports with basic notions of efficiency, fairness, and common sense.
By characterizing venue as a "Jjurisdictional requirement,"…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Fletcher & Gerelds v. StowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Shreve v. Copper Bell Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1891
- Sutterfield v. District Court in and for Arapahoe CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Kirby v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.