Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Toll

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1891No. 268PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

— Hoffman & Barrett, as special partners for that purpose only, took a contract from the school trustees of the city of Noblesville to furnish materials and construct a public school building in said city, according to certain plans and specifications.

They employed Toll to do the plastering upon the building, and when the structure was almost completed the school trustees contracted with the firm of Smead & Co. to put in machinery and apparatus for heating and ventilating, and a dry-closet system. Smead & Co. contracted with Barrett, who assumed to act for the firm of Hoffman & Barrett, to *288do…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Porter v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. HullIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. WeikleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Bay v. BarenieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Schellenbeck v. StudebakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. KyteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API