Legal Opinion

Standard Carloading Corp. v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1949No. 31808PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question presented to this court requires the construction of the term, “business done by the corporation,” as used in Section 5498, General Code.

The commissioner contends that Standard during each of those years was doing business in Ohio and the increased value was based upon that premise; Standard claims that the assessments are erroneous because on the facts it was not doing business in Ohio during the period in question.

The method of calculating the amount of franchise tax due from a corporation was fully analyzed by this court in the case of Cliffs Corp. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 138…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cliffs Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nationwide Corp. v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Diamond Financial Holdings, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Corner Co. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Diamond Financial Holdings, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Diamond Financial Holdings, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API