Legal Opinion

Bell v. Allen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court of Talladega. Tried before Hon. W. H. Smith. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.

The suit was commenced by the appellant, Thomas B. Bell, in his own name, not joining his wife, on a promissory note payable to him alone, made by the appellee. Subsequently the complaint was amended by joining the wife as party plaintiff, and adding a count on account stated by the plaintiffs and defendant, whereby it was ascertained the defendant was indebted to the wife, on dealings with her whilst sole, in the sum of seven hundred and eighteen dollars and twelve cents, and therefore made his promissory note payable to the husband. The evidence introduced on the trial was without conflict,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Upchurch v. NorsworthySupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  2. Walker v. FennerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  3. Brown v. BeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. English's Ex'r v. McNair's Admr'sSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Poole v. GriffithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Marcus v. People's Sav. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Sahlberg v. J. A. Teague Furn. Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  5. Mosaic Templars of America v. FlanaganAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API