Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Lechman & Johnson, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 9, 1999No. 122, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

Illustrated here is a lay person’s misunderstanding of his legal rights. The appellant sold goods on credit without creating a security interest. When certain of the goods came back into the possession of the seller for the purpose of conforming them to the contract, the seller retained the goods while demanding payment of the outstanding balance of the sale price. As we explain below, the appellant thereby converted the goods to his own use and became liable in damages.

The appellee (plaintiff at trial) is Lechman & Johnson, Inc. (the Firm). It is a telecommunications…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Klam v. KoppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Russell-Vaughn Ford, Inc. v. RouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Saunders v. MullinixCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  5. Patapsco Trailer Service & Sales, Inc. v. Eastern Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Darcars Motors of Silver Spring, Inc. v. BorzymCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Serio v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Dynacorp Ltd. v. Aramtel Ltd.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Nickens v. Mount Vernon Realty Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Isaac v. CrichlowSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API