Legal Opinion

People v. Cline

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1890No. 20585PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from orders overruling a motion in arrest of judgment, and refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote. C.

C. — The defendant was tried and convicted of grand larceny. From the judgment rendered in the premises, an order overruling his motion in arrest of judgment, and an order refusing him a new trial, he appeals. The order denying the motion in arrest of judgment is not appealable. (People v. Majors, 65 Cal. 100; 52 Am. Rep. 295.)

*376It is claimed that the record does not disclose the fact that the defendant personally pleaded not guilty to the information filed against him; that for this reason it does not appear that the court below had jurisdiction to try him.

The record shows that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. SpinatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. People v. MackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. State v. DaughertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. State v. Wong Wen TeungOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API