Legal Opinion

Cope v. Ivey

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided November 1, 2019No. 5:19-cv-00776Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION MAX S. COPE, } } Plaintiff, } } v. } Case No.: 5:19-cv-00776-MHH } KAY IVEY, ALABAMA } DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, } and VERNON BARNETT, } Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In its July 23, 2019 order, the Court asked pro se plaintiff Max S. Cope to file an amended complaint alleging facts “that enable him to avoid the Tax Injunction Act.” (Doc. 5). In response, Mr. Cope filed an amended complaint, alleging that he has been fighting with the Alabama Department of Revenue since 2009, that tax assessments occurred in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Colonial Pipeline Company, and Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Marcus E. Collins, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Amos v. Glynn County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API