Legal Opinion

Fettig v. Kailes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 1993No. D9006-65217; CA A71038Published

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.

Father seeks modification of an order requiring him to pay $900 per month child support. He contends that the trial court erred in calculating mother’s income and in not further reducing the presumptive support obligation under the Uniform Child Support Guidelines. OAR 137-50-320 to OAR 137-50-490. Because the trial court erred in calculating mother’s income, we reverse and remand for recalculation of support.

Father and mother were not married and they had a child after a brief relationship. Mother brought an action to establish paternity and determine child support. Father did not contest…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of UppendahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. In re the Marriage of BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API