Legal Opinion
Rebaudo v. Security Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 7, 1972No. 4904PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STOULIG, Judge.
Plaintiff, Peter J. Rebaudo, brought this suit against his employer’s compensation carrier claiming that he was totally and permanently disabled as a result of an accident which occurred within the course and scope of his employment, and that he is therefore entitled to workmen’s compensation at the rate of $35 a week for 400 weeks. After a trial of the matter, the district court held that plaintiff had failed to prove his claimed disability by a preponderance of the evidence and dismissed his suit, subsequent to which this devolutive appeal was taken.
The record reflects that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Readco Industries, Inc. v. Myrmax Specialties, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Gay v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bagley v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Ricks v. Associated Indemnity Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sensley v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- May v. Finest Foods, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Orgeron v. New Orleans Stevedoring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Todero v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977