Second National Bank v. Wrightson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The motion to dismiss the appeal in this cáse, must he-overruled. As we shall affirm the orders appealed from,, and as the result will he the same to the parties, whether *83the appeal is dismissed or the orders affirmed, we do not think it necessary to state at length the reasons for overruling the motion to dismiss.
Samuel Stines, the appellee’s testator, deposited with the appellant one thousand dollars, and took a certificate of deposit in the following terms :
$1,000. . Certificate of Deposit.
Second National Bank of Baltimore, Md. December 13, 1880.
Samuel Stines has deposited in this bank one…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taylor v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Murray v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
3Cited by19 opinions
- Higgins v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Mayor of Baltimore v. DeLuca-Davis Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Maryland Port Administration v. John W. Brawner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Boulden v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.